The Humane Slaughter Act

Document Sections:

INTRODUCTION

All meat sold or traded in the United States must derive from animals slaughtered under inspection at a USDA federal- or state-approved facility. The main legislative protection to address humane treatment of animals at slaughterhouses is the federal Humane Slaughter Act. The Act provides no protection to the more than 5 billion poultry slaughtered each year, nor to ritually-slaughtered animals.

HISTORY

The history of the Humane Slaughter Act is detailed in Animals and their Legal Rights published by the Animal Welfare Institute based in Washington D.C. Humane slaughter legislation, according to the Institute, was first introduced in the United States Senate on April 11, 1955, by Senator Hubert Humphrey of Minnesota and in the House of Representatives on May 9, 1955, by Representative Martha Griffiths of Michigan. These bills were refused a favorable report by the United States Department of Agriculture, then under the leadership of Ezra Taft Benson, on the grounds that American enterprise could provide better humane slaughter than legislation could, although American enterprise had had fifty years to do so. As a result, the bills were tabled without a hearing.

The struggle to resurrect and pass the bill continued for several years. In 1958, the House overwhelmingly passed a humane slaughter bill but it was gutted by the Senate Agriculture Committee, which transformed it into a study bill. Senator Humphrey then took to the floor of the Senate in a seven-hour battle to overturn the Agriculture Committee's action. Humphrey finally succeeded as the Senate adopted the Humane Slaughter Act by a vote of 72 to 9 with an amendment that permitted religious slaughter to occur without prior stunning of the animals. President Eisenhower signed the bill into law with an effective date of June 30, 1960. The Act covered 80% of U.S. plants by requiring that humane methods be used by all packing companies selling meat to the federal government.

In 1978, Senator Robert Dole of Kansas and Congressman George E. Brown, Jr. of California sponsored legislation that expanded the coverage of the Act to protect livestock at all plants that are federally inspected. The legislation intended to provide more effective enforcement by allowing federal inspectors to stop processing lines until any cruel methods are corrected. However, the economic impact of stopping a processing line is so great that inspectors are rarely able to do so. An additional requirement of the 1978 law was that any meat imported into the U.S. must be derived from animals slaughtered in a manner that accords with the federal Humane Slaughter Act.

SUMMARY OF THE ACT

Final regulations under the Humane Slaughter Act were published in 1979. A summary for USDA personnel stated in part:

Handling Requirements

The animals shall be handled humanely in the livestock pens and while being driven to and from the pens. Driving of livestock shall be accomplished with a minimum of excitement and discomfort to the animals. With respect to permitted driving implements, determination of the humaneness of a driving implement lies as much in the way it is used as in the implement itself. However, metal pipes and sharp pointed objects shall not be permitted. Electric prods, canvas slappers, or other implements used to drive animals shall be employed as little as possible to minimize excitement and injury to the livestock being driven. All livestock shall have access to water. Feed shall be supplied if livestock are to be held more than 24 hours before being slaughtered. There shall be sufficient room in the pens for animals held overnight to lie down. Electronic prods which are connected to AC house current shall be reduced by a transformer to the lowest effective voltage not to exceed 50 volts AC. There is some evidence that voltages as low as 20 volts AC are effective.

Downer animals shall not be dragged. In some instances, immediate slaughter may be the most humane thing to do, in which case the animal shall be given ante-mortem inspection and then stunned before moving it.

Pens, driveways, and ramps shall be kept in good repair to prevent injury to the livestock. Sharp objects, loose, splintered, or broken boards and other pain producing objects shall be eliminated or repaired. Pen floors and alleyways shall be slip resistant. Sand may be used to provide livestock with a more secure footing, especially during winter months....

Slaughter Methods

Since animals whose meat will be sold or traded must be slaughtered under an inspector's supervision, most slaughter is performed off the farm at slaughterhouses. Many relatively small slaughterhouses have closed as there has been continuing consolidation of control of the meat industry by a few large packers. As a result, animals often arrive at packing plants only after a long and stressful journey. For example, hogs and laying hens raised in Massachusetts are typically trucked to Pennsylvania and New Jersey for slaughter.

Excluded from the Humane Slaughter Act, poultry are typically shackled and hoisted to hang upside down fully conscious, conveyed to where they are electrically stunned, then mechanically slit across their throats. However, unlike most chickens raised for meat, laying hens are usually not stunned before slaughter. Most of these birds are raised confined in small cages and various factors, including lack of exercise, increase the chance that their relatively fragile bones will shatter during stunning, which would decrease the economic value of their meat. In all types of slaughter plants, the higher the speed of the conveyor line, the greater the risk that individual animals will suffer an inhumane death, workers will be injured, and inspection of carcasses will miss signs of disease.

For animals other than poultry and ritually-slaughtered animals, it is a requirement of The Humane Slaughter Act that livestock must be stunned into unconsciousness before they are killed. The stunning of livestock is normally accomplished by an electrical device or a gun. There are several types of gun employed:

Free fire cartridge A bullet is shot into the head of the animal. Use of this technique is rare, and only occurs in facilities where the head meat is condemned as unfit for consumption.

Penetrating bolt stunner Either an exploding cartridge or, in a pneumatic stun gun, a blast of air from an air line, drives forward a piston and an attached penetrating rod that enters the skull and brain of the animal and then retracts into the gun.

Concussion stunner This device operates like a penetrating bolt stunner, but a short, mushroom shaped knob strikes the skull producing unconsciousness without entering the brain.

The presence or absence of horns on the animal and the conformity of the particular breed determines where on the skull the stun gun is placed, although general recommendations are available.

Penetrating bolt or concussion stunners are normally used, at both small and large slaughterhouses, to stun cattle. These stunners, also, are usually used when goats, sheep, and hogs are slaughtered at small slaughterhouses, while the larger plants more often use electric devices on these smaller species.

One type of electrical stunner takes the form of large tongs with round disks on the ends, which carry an electrical charge through the brain when placed on either side of the head. In Europe, pigs are often passed through a carbon dioxide chamber to rend er them unconscious, but this technique is not common in the U.S.

A training film, Humane Slaughter of Livestock, which depicts optimum stunning techniques, is available for slaughterhouse personnel from the World Society for the Protection of Animals at 29 Perkins Street, Jamaica Plain, MA 02130 (617) 522-7000.

KOSHER SLAUGHTER

Kosher foods are prepared and served according to the dietary laws of the Jewish faith. Kosher slaughter is a specialized function performed by some meat packers. Meat for the Kosher trade must come from animals slaughtered by a Rabbi or a trained representative called a shochet. The Kosher method of slaughter involves slitting an animal's throat and bleeding it without first rendering it unconscious. Kosher practitioners believe this method to be humane if the animals are handled gently, although this is debated. There are other requirements of Kosher slaughter, including the Rabbi's inspection of the carcass.

The original intent of Kosher slaughter included humaneness as an essential aspect. Complications arise due to the fact that USDA's sanitary regulations prohibit contact of the animal's cut surface with the slaughterhouse floor. To comply with this requirement, slaughterhouses may shackle animals by the leg and hang them upside down prior to slitting their throats. While this may not present a problem when an animal has been properly stunned, it can cause severe injury to animals and workers when, as in Kosher slaughter, the animal is still conscious. An alternative, more humane method, that satisfies both the requirements of Kosher slaughter and of the USDA, is the use of a specially designed pen that keeps the animals propped up off the floor, even after their throats are slit, through the use of a belly lift rail between their legs. Some slaughterhouses make use of this alternative while many do not.

Some of the meat found in conventional markets derives from animals slaughtered by Kosher methods since the hindquarters of an animal are never sold as Kosher and these parts are, therefore, sold in regular channels. Approximately five percent of all animals are slaughtered by Kosher methods. The percentage of individual plants that perform Kosher slaughter is higher than five percent since the smaller plants are more likely to offer this service than the larger ones.

HALAL SLAUGHTER

Halal slaughter, a practice of the Moslem faith, also had origins in the humane intent of religious teachings that emphasize the importance of humane care of animals. However the practice requires slitting the throats of conscious animals, and some slaughter houses first shackle and hoist them in the air to comply with the USDA rules against an animal's cut surface contacting the slaughterhouse floor. As in Kosher slaughter, such painful shackling and hoisting of conscious animals is unnecessary. A properly designed pen is a more humane method many facilities use to comply with both religious and USDA requirements.

For both conventional and religious slaughter, there is tremendous variability in slaughterhouses in regard to the humaneness of their practices. The attitude of the management is the key factor. Where the personnel are found to be humane, it almost invariably can be traced to managers of the facility that have made a commitment, for ethical or economic reasons, to careful treatment of the animals.

[Source unknown]